Attorney Specializing in Music Publishing Contracts

Review, negotiate, and customize—before you sign

A music publishing contract often binds you for longer than any band, label, or management team. We review music publishing contracts, publishing agreements, and exclusive author contracts; negotiate them with publishers; and restructure them—for songwriters, producers, artists with their own publishing companies, and publishers.

REHKATSCH LAWYERS known for:

Known from:

Basics

What a music publisher does—and why the contract will be with you for decades

A record label handles the recording, while the music publisher handles the song itself—the composition and lyrics—regardless of who sings or produces it. The publisher registers your works with GEMA, ensures that revenue from radio, streaming, concerts, and recordings is distributed correctly, grants licenses for films, TV series, games, and advertising, places songs with other artists, and, in the best-case scenario, connects you with the right co-writers. Confusing the publisher with the record label happens more often than you might think—and can lead to signing two contracts that overlap in crucial areas. We’ll give you an overview of music law to show how responsibilities are generally divided in the music business.

How does a music publisher make money? Through a fixed share of all revenue generated by your works. For performance and broadcasting rights, which are administered by GEMA, this amounts to one-third; for mechanical rights, it’s 40 percent of the author’s share. For licenses that the publisher grants directly—such as for a film or a commercial—it typically receives half of the proceeds. That’s what it’s paid to do. The Publishing Act imposes an obligation to exploit the work (Section 1, Sentence 2, VerlG), and the specialized literature derives from this an obligation to promote the work, which also encompasses the rights managed through GEMA. A publisher that merely collects royalties is not fulfilling its part of the agreement.

Why the contract has such a long-lasting effect: Many music publishing contracts officially run for three or five years. However, you often grant the rights to the songs created during this period for the entire term of protection—that is, up to 70 years after the death of the last surviving author. The term of the contract and the duration of the rights are two different things. Those who don’t distinguish between them when signing often don’t realize it until years later, when a song suddenly appears in an advertising campaign or the catalog is sold.

Every week, we review music publishing contracts—from major publishers, artist-run labels, and production teams. At first glance, most of them look similar. The difference between a fair contract and a bad one often lies in a single half-sentence.

Wappen Musikrecht Rehkatsch Rechtsanwälte

The most important question to ask about any music publishing contract: What exactly does the publisher do to earn its share—year after year?

Our Services

Review, negotiate, advise, draft

Whether you’re a songwriter about to sign your first publishing deal, an artist launching your own label, or a publisher signing authors—we’re here to support you every step of the way.

01

Review

We'll read through your entire contract—including all attachments and title deeds—and show you where it binds you, what it actually guarantees you, and where you stand to lose money. You'll get a clear assessment, not legal jargon.

02

Negotiation

We negotiate with the publisher or the publishing house—openly, if desired, or behind the scenes, if preferred. We know where publishers are willing to compromise and where it’s not worth the struggle.

03

Consulting

Whether it's before your first meeting with a publisher, when you're launching your own imprint, or if you're having trouble with an existing contract: We'll help you determine which type of contract is right for your career.

04

Creation

For publishers, publishing houses, and production teams, we draft exclusive author contracts, title contracts, co-publishing agreements, and administrative contracts—tailored to your catalog rather than based on a standard form.

Would you like to have your music publishing contract reviewed, or do you have questions about specific clauses?
We'll take a look at your contract and discuss with you what really matters.

Contract Types

What kind of music publishing contract do you have?

“Publishing contract” is a general term. It encompasses a wide variety of structures—and each has its own parameters.

1

Exclusive Author Agreement

The classic publishing deal for songwriters: You grant the publisher all the works you write during the term of the contract, often including those you’ve already written but haven’t released yet. In return, you usually receive an advance and a commitment to promote your work. The key factors are the term of the agreement, the minimum number of songs to be submitted, and the specific definition of “all works.”

2

Title Contract

A contract for a single song or a small group of works. It stands on its own—for example, when a publisher takes on only a specific title—or it is entered into as an addendum to an exclusive contract. In the latter case, it is often underestimated—more on this below.

3

Publishing Contract

You or your management team will set up your own edition—a small publishing company that holds the publishing rights to your songs. In most cases, the edition partners with an established publisher, which handles the work and earns a share of the profits in return. How those profits are divided can mean a lot of money.

4

Co-Publishing Agreement

Two publishers share the publishing rights to a work or a catalog, often on a 50/50 basis. One of the two takes the lead and makes decisions regarding day-to-day operations. Who that is and what “taking the lead” means in the event of a dispute should be clarified before a dispute arises.

5

Administration Agreement

The publisher handles only the administrative tasks: registration, billing, and rights clearance. You or your label retain the rights; the administrator receives a commission. This is often the more streamlined solution for artists who place their songs themselves.

6

Sub-publishing Agreement

Your publisher commissions partners in other countries to handle distribution abroad. These partners retain their share before the remainder is remitted to you. Your own contract specifies—or may not specify—how much this share can be and whether you’ll even be informed of it.

Don’t confuse this with your contract with your record label: We explain how a publishing company and a record label differ from one another—and what you should look out for in your artist contract with the label—on a separate page.

And why a sample music publishing contract found online is rarely helpful: Samples are either written from the publisher’s perspective or are so general that they leave out the crucial details. No form will answer the questions that determine the financial terms and the scope of your commitment—such as scope, term, payment terms, and promotion.

Publishing Contract

Publishing Contract: Your Own Edition—and Who Ends Up Making Money

Having your own edition sounds like independence: You retain the publishing rights to your songs yourself, rather than handing them over entirely to a publisher. In practice, however, most editions work with an established publisher as a co-publisher. The publisher provides infrastructure, contacts, and administrative support—and in return receives a share of the publishing rights, often half.

This is exactly where it’s worth taking a closer look. “50/50 under the lead” of the major publisher often means: You split the revenue equally, but not the decisions. The lead publisher determines who gets a license, at what price, and which sub-publisher to work with abroad. That can be perfectly fine. It should just be a conscious decision—not one hidden in the fine print.

A second point that many overlook: Is the publisher allowed to transfer your contract to other companies? Many contract drafts permit the transfer to “affiliated companies,” co-publishing partners, and administrative partners without asking you. Who these companies are is usually not specified anywhere. You simply won’t know who ends up with your songs. The law gives you recourse here: Under Section 34 of the German Copyright Act (UrhG), you can, under certain conditions, reclaim your rights if the publisher is sold or if the ownership structure changes significantly. Whether this applies in your case depends on the wording of the contract.

Starting Your Own Publishing Imprint: What You Should Figure Out First

You can start a music publishing company as a sole proprietorship or through a corporation. To ensure that the publishing royalties actually reach your publishing company, it needs its own membership with GEMA or a partner to handle the administration. Before doing so, you should know what your publishing company can handle in-house and what it needs to outsource—and how its value will develop over time. After all, a well-managed publishing catalog is an asset that can be sold later on. We explain how this works on our page about selling a music catalog.

And one more thing: A music publishing company without its own administrative department is dependent on its partner publisher. Whoever prepares statements, registers works, and responds to licensing requests is at the source of all information. That’s why every publishing contract should specify which reports your publishing division receives, how often statements are issued, and what happens when the partnership ends—before the songs become successful, not afterward.

Publishing Contract: Your Own Edition—
Who Gets What?
Coming soon…

Title Contracts

Title Contracts as Attachments: The Fine Print That Comes Later

Title agreements are a key part of a publisher’s day-to-day business. They are also entered into under an existing exclusive agreement to specify exactly which songs and rights are included, and they provide the data needed for GEMA registration. They are often attached as templates to the main contract and submitted “at the publisher’s request.” In one draft we reviewed, the attachments even explicitly stated: “Please DO NOT sign here.” These documents therefore arrive separately later—and are often not reviewed again. Four areas where we take a closer look:

1 The investment proposal constitutes the contract

Some framework agreements stipulate that, in the event of any conflicts, the individual contract takes precedence. So every time you sign an addendum, your deal could be postponed retroactively without anyone discussing the main contract.

2 Recorded even without a signature

Often, all works are covered by the contract even if a title contract was never signed. In that case, the addendum is merely a formality for the publisher and offers no protection to you.

3 Deadlines Depend on the Date

Some deadlines don't start running until the title deed is signed—for example, the deadline for revocation due to non-exercise. That's why it matters when you sign it.

4 Approval of the Publisher's Participation

The title agreement typically includes your separate consent for the publisher to receive a share of statutory remuneration claims (Section 27a VGG). Anyone who signs it should know what they are agreeing to.

So here’s our advice: Treat every title agreement as its own little contract. Read it, compare it to the master agreement, and ask questions if anything seems unfamiliar to you. Once we’ve reviewed your exclusive agreement, we’ll also take a look at any subsequent addenda upon request—that way, we’ll know what to look for.

Publishing

Publishing rights to the work

Rights of use to the composition and lyrics that the author grants to a music publisher. The publisher exploits and licenses the work and receives a share of the revenue through GEMA. The copyright itself remains with the author.

Distribution

How the proceeds are distributed: Publisher's share, GEMA allocation formula, and refunds

Those who know how the money is distributed negotiate differently. The most important facts at a glance—explained in detail on our GEMA page.

33,33 %

Performance and Broadcast

For a published work, the publisher receives one-third of the royalties. The remainder is divided between the composer and the lyricist in a 64-to-36 ratio, unless otherwise agreed. A different split is also possible by mutual agreement, provided that both parties receive a minimum share.

40 %

Mechanical Rights

For reproductions—that is, sound recordings and portions of streaming—the publisher receives 40 percent. The composer and lyricist always split the remainder equally; there is no optional agreement in this case.

50 : 50

Film, Dubbing, Advertising

Royalties granted directly by the publisher are usually split 50-50. Some contracts deduct an administrative fee up front, often between 5 and 15 percent. That’s not much—until you’re dealing with a major campaign.

Sample calculation: rearranged song with lyrics, without a royalty-free agreement

≈ 42,67 %

Composer

24,00 %

Lyricist

33,33 %

Publisher

With regard to performance and broadcast rights. The rigid formula of 5/12 for the composer, 3/12 for the lyricist, and 4/12 for the publisher is still circulating online. Anyone who explains it to you that way today is using outdated figures.

In addition, many publishers require a refund: a portion of their mechanical royalty share is paid back to you—in practice, between 10 and 50 percent, and in some cases more. Whether this is possible—and to what extent—depends on what you bring to the table—and how well the negotiations went. For electronic music that doesn’t require significant editorial work, revenue splits that heavily favor the authors are also common. And for printed sheet music, authors typically receive 10 to 15 percent of the net retail price.

Advertising and Dubbing

Advertising and Synchronization: Who Decides Where Your Song Ends Up?

This is where one of the greatest opportunities for revenue lies—and one of the biggest differences between contracts that appear identical at first glance.

01

Advertisement: It's all about the "whether"

Under the GEMA licensing agreement, the right to use a song in a commercial remains with the copyright holder. GEMA only licenses the subsequent broadcast of the commercial. So the “whether or not” comes at its own price—and the question of who decides that belongs in your publishing contract.

02

Film and Sync: Two-Stage

Formally, the right to sync music with visuals belongs to GEMA, but in individual cases, it can be reclaimed and licensed directly. The sync fee is in addition to subsequent royalties from public performance and broadcast. The key factor is who negotiates and who must give approval.

03

Your Name, Your Attitude

Advertising also affects your moral rights as an author. Someone who has spent their whole life writing songs against smoking doesn't want to hear their song used in a cigarette ad. Whether you can prevent that is decided when you sign the contract, not when the movie is released.

A comparison drawn from our practice illustrates just how widely contracts on this issue can vary: One contract makes advertising, film, synchronization, and adaptations contingent on your prior consent in each individual case. Another contract grants the publisher an irrevocable power of attorney, allowing it to grant promotional consent on your behalf—expressly even if no compensation is received for it. At first glance, both contracts look almost identical. The difference lies in a single clause.

Then there’s the money: If an administrative fee is deducted before the split, your share decreases even before the money is divided. And when it comes to revisions—such as a new version of the text for a commercial or a remix for a trailer—there’s also the question of who gets a cut. All of this can be worked out—but only as long as nothing has been signed yet.

Do you want your song to be featured in a commercial or a TV series? Send us a quick note explaining what it's about.

Music Publishing Contract: Immediate Contact

Writing Camps

Songwriting Camp: The Promise Belongs in the Contract

These days, hits are almost never created alone at the kitchen table. They are created during sessions, co-writing sessions, and writing camps, where a record label brings together songwriters, producers, and often the artist themselves for a few days. The numbers show just how much the business has changed:

6,8

In 2025, songs with multiple songwriters averaged a spot in the top 10 on Spotify—not a single song was written by a solo artist (Chartmetric, Year in Music 2025).

4,5

Authors per hit today, compared to 1.7 in the 1970s (iMusician Study 2023).

10 %

Of the current Top 100 singles, only one still has a single songwriter (iMusician Study 2023).

6

On average, publishers are involved in one Top 10 hit by at least four artists (Music Reports / Songdex).

A joint camp organized by three publishers at the Reeperbahn Festival demonstrated how this works in practice: 18 songwriters from four countries came together, and the result was 16 new songs. There are camps centered on a specific genre and camps centered on a single artist, who sometimes co-writes the songs—a practice that’s particularly common in pop and Schlager.

Publishers know this and use it to attract authors: with camps, co-writing opportunities, and access to artists and producers they couldn’t reach on their own. In the industry, songwriting camps are considered an investment; some are even publicly funded, such as international songwriting camps organized by music publishers through the Initiative Musik. For many songwriters, this promise is the real reason for signing an exclusive contract.

The problem: Contracts often contain no binding provisions on this matter. We regularly see drafts in which promotion, support, and funding are phrased as optional provisions. The publisher “may” organize camps—it isn’t required to. But verbal promises are only worth as much as the contract allows. That’s why these points need to be addressed before you sign:

  • – Camps and co-writing sessions must be a genuine obligation of the publisher, not a voluntary service.
  • – Who pays for travel, lodging, and studio time—and will that be deducted from your earnings later? The invitation rarely specifies who actually pays for the camp in the end.
  • – Split sheets on-site: The shares are recorded before everyone leaves. This aligns with the voluntary agreement with GEMA and prevents future disputes.
  • – What happens with co-writes when other songwriters are under contract with other publishers? A “100-percent publisher’s share” simply doesn’t add up mathematically in that case.
  • – Are you allowed to attend another publisher’s or label’s camp if you’re invited? Exclusivity clauses can close doors for you.
  • – Do camp songs count in full toward your minimum delivery requirement, or only proportionally? With six authors per song, meeting the proportional quota is virtually impossible.
Wappen Musikrecht Rehkatsch Rechtsanwälte

Whatever is promised to you when you first meet must be included as an obligation in the contract—otherwise, it’s just a promise.

Songwriting Camp: Who Pays in the End?
To be continued…

Contact

How to Reach Us

Choose the option that works best for you—we'll get back to you quickly.

Schedule an appointment

Right in our calendar—select your preferred date

What'sApp

Quick Questions, Quick Answers

Phone

Available directly Mon–Fri

Email

Write to us about what's on your mind

Clause Radar

Clauses We Examine Closely

Based on the music publishing contracts we review, we know the areas where issues regularly arise. Here are eight of them—on the left, as they are often phrased in the contract; on the right, what we look out for.

Duration

Here's what we focus on

How long you're actually committed isn't what it says on page 1. "Three years" can quickly turn into an open-ended commitment—the timeline below shows how.

Minimum Delivery Quantity

Here's what we focus on

Whether that condition is even within your control. If not, the contract will be extended without you being able to do anything about it.

Scope

Here's what we focus on

What exactly is covered: co-writes, guest appearances, commissioned works, and songs for other artists. You can’t grant rights to someone else’s share anyway. And contracts for future works can be terminated after five years—more on that in a moment.

Advance Payment

Here's what we focus on

What is used for the calculation—just your author’s share, or the total amount? Is a refund included? And how is sales tax handled? There’s a well-known tax trap with this structure that you should be aware of beforehand.

Publishing Services

Here's what we focus on

Is there a specific list of services? “Can” instead of “must” means: The publisher is guaranteed to get its share, and you might get paid for your work.

Administration

Here's what we focus on

Who actually does the publishing work? Administration is the publishing house’s core responsibility. If you take it on, what’s the point of their involvement?

Disclosure

Here's what we focus on

Who ultimately owns the songs and who decides that. You can't ask about something you know nothing about. The right of withdrawal under Section 34 of the German Copyright Act (UrhG) applies here.

Control and Conflict

Here's what we focus on

Whether your rights of control are practically enforceable and whether you are cutting off your own path to claiming statutory back payments. Since 2021, you also have an annual right to information under Section 32d of the German Copyright Act (UrhG).

And sometimes it’s just a matter of technical detail: In a contract we reviewed, the amounts in numerals and in words didn’t match in several places. Even mistakes like these can cost money in the event of a dispute. We’ll discuss with you—not online—what wording we’ll use to address these issues.

"Can" instead of "must": What is your publisher actually doing to earn its share?
To be continued…

Send us your draft. During a no-obligation initial consultation, we'll determine whether we can take on your case and what the review will cost.

Duration

How Three Years Become Seven

The cover page specifies a reasonable term. However, due to renewal clauses, minimum delivery requirements, set-off provisions, and options, this can turn into a commitment whose end no one can predict. Here’s a typical scenario that we see time and again in draft contracts:

0

Signature

The advance payment is made, and the three-year term begins.

3

Year 3

The contract is actually up—but the minimum delivery requirement has not yet been met.

4

Year 4

Automatic renewal until the advance payment has been fully applied.

5

Year 5

Effective immediately, the right of termination under § 40 of the German Copyright Act (UrhG) applies to future works.

7

7th Grade

The publisher is exercising its option—the rights to the songs will continue regardless.

Not every contract works this way, and not every one of these clauses is invalid. But it’s the total that makes the difference: If you only look at the number on page 1 when signing, you’re planning your career with an end date that doesn’t actually exist. That’s why, with every review, we calculate when you’ll actually be free in the worst-case scenario—and what adjustments can change that.

The Central Standard

The limit is five years: Section 40 of the German Copyright Act (UrhG)

§ 40 UrhG · Contracts for Future Works

§

(1) A contract under which the author undertakes to grant rights of use to future works that are not specified in any detail or are specified only by genre must be in writing. It may be terminated by either party five years after the contract is concluded. The notice period is six months, unless a shorter period has been agreed upon.
(2) The right to terminate may not be waived in advance. Other contractual or statutory rights to terminate remain unaffected.

In plain language

An exclusive songwriting contract that binds you to all future songs must be in writing and can be terminated after five years with six months’ notice—regardless of any provisions in the contract regarding renewal or options. You cannot validly waive this right. However, the termination applies only to works that have not yet been delivered by that time. Works that have already been accepted remain with the publisher. In addition, there are other avenues, such as revocation due to non-exercise under § 41 UrhG or the right to exploit the work elsewhere after ten years in the case of a pure lump-sum payment (§ 40a UrhG).

Caution

Before You Sign: Things You Should Avoid Doing

Most problems with publishing contracts don't arise in court, but in the week before the contract is signed.

Signing Under Time Pressure

"We need this by Friday; the camp starts Monday." A fair publisher will wait a week for your review.

Blindly copy attachments

Title agreements, split sheets, and letters of consent are not mere formalities. Each attachment can change the terms of the deal.

Relying on verbal promises

Camps, sessions, promotions: You can't claim anything later that isn't in the contract.

Keep the advance payment for income

An advance is money taken in advance from your own earnings. Until it's settled, there's often nothing coming in for a long time.

Do Not Reconcile Two Contracts

Label, publisher, management: When rights overlap, you end up paying the price for the conflict.

Share the draft publicly

Screenshots in groups and forums are rarely helpful and often violate confidentiality agreements.

From Real-World Experience

A case we often encounter

Case Study · Anonymized

A young songwriter is offered an exclusive contract by an artist-focused label, with a major publishing company serving as the lead co-publisher in the background. On paper: a three-year term and a decent advance. But a closer read reveals a different picture. The publisher “may” provide support, but is not required to do so. The author is expected to maintain the Excel spreadsheets for GEMA registration himself. And the contract could have been transferred to any affiliate company without his consent. We provided point-by-point commentary on the draft for the author and his management.

The outcome of the negotiations will remain confidential—as is the case with all of our clients.

Your Situation

Have you signed your publishing contract yet?

Yes, the contract is already in effect

Then all is not lost. In 2022, the Federal Court of Justice ruled that a music publishing contract is not automatically contrary to public policy simply because the publisher’s share later amounts to a multiple of the lump sum paid (BGH, judgment of April 21, 2022 – I ZR 214/20). The decisive factor is the time the contract was concluded. However, subsequent success may justify a claim to additional royalties under Section 32a of the German Copyright Act (UrhG)—more on this on our page about reasonable compensation. In addition, termination under § 40 UrhG and revocation under §§ 34, 41 UrhG may be considered. Whether older clauses that exclude revocation for years remain valid after the 2021 reform also depends on when you signed the contract.

No, I still have the draft in front of me

Then now is the best time. Before you sign, almost everything can still be negotiated; after that, very little can be changed. We’ll review the term, scope, billing, advertising, and attachments before they bind you—and let you know where it’s worth renegotiating and where it isn’t. In a no-obligation initial consultation, we’ll determine whether we can take on your case and what the review will cost.

Attorney Patrick Rehkatsch

Attorney Specializing in Copyright and Media Law

Patrick Rehkatsch knows the music industry not just from contracts. From 1995 to 2000, he worked as a freelancer in marketing and TV promotion for Universal Music, and at times also for Sony, Edel Records, Kontor Records, and Berlin Music. Today, he negotiates music publishing, edition, and exclusive author contracts for songwriters, producers, artists, and publishers.

As a member of the International Association of Entertainment Lawyers (IAEL), he collaborates with a global network of music attorneys and regularly attends MIDEM in Cannes and the Amsterdam Dance Event.

Frequently Asked Questions About Music Publishing Contracts

What is a music publishing contract, and what does a music publisher do?

With a music publishing contract, you grant a publisher rights to your compositions and lyrics. The publisher manages these works, registers them with GEMA, grants licenses for film, advertising, and other uses, places songs with artists, and promotes you as a songwriter. Unlike a record label, the publisher isn’t involved in the recording itself, but rather focuses on the song behind it.

The publisher receives a fixed share of the revenue from your works. With GEMA, this amounts to one-third for public performance and broadcast, and 40 percent of the author’s share for mechanical rights. Licenses granted directly for film or advertising are usually split 50-50. Whether a portion of that is returned to you as a royalty is a matter of negotiation.

The exclusive author contract covers all works you write during its term. The song-specific contract applies to individual songs, either on their own or as an addendum to the exclusive contract. Under a publishing contract, you or your management establish your own small publishing company, which typically works with a larger publisher as a co-publisher.

No. As a composer or lyricist, you can register with GEMA yourself and register your works. Without a publisher, you’ll receive the full royalty share for unpublished works. A publisher is worth it if they actually bring you benefits: placements, sync deals, co-writes, and efficient administration. That’s exactly what should be in the contract.

That depends on the contract and the timing. You can terminate contracts for future works after five years with six months’ notice (Section 40 of the German Copyright Act (UrhG)). If the publisher fails to exploit your works, you may be able to revoke the license on the grounds of non-use (Section 41 of the German Copyright Act [UrhG]); if the publisher is sold, revocation under Section 34 of the German Copyright Act [UrhG] may be possible under certain circumstances. We’ll clarify which option works best for you and which works it covers during our consultation.

As a rule, the advance is non-refundable but is offset against your future earnings. So until it’s “earned back,” you’ll receive little or no payment. The key factors are what the advance is offset against and whether the term is tied to full offset. Both of these can significantly extend the commitment period.

Consent for commercial use generally rests with the copyright holder; the right to produce a film is licensed directly on a case-by-case basis. However, many contracts delegate this decision to the publisher; some even do so through an irrevocable power of attorney. Whether you have a say in the matter is specified in your contract—and should be clarified before you sign it.

Often only on a pro-rata basis. Many contracts count two works, each at 50 percent, as a single work. For camp songs with five or six authors, a pro-rata quota then becomes virtually unattainable, and the contract is extended. How co-writes are counted is therefore one of the points we examine during every review.

An initial consultation starts at 250 € plus VAT, and a review of a contract starts at 500 € plus VAT. The exact cost depends on the scope of the contract and its attachments. During a no-obligation initial consultation, we’ll determine whether we can take on your case and what the consultation will cost.

Get Started Now

Understand your publishing contract before you sign it.

Do you have a manuscript from a publisher, are you starting your own publishing house, or do you want to know what your old contract still has to offer? In a no-obligation initial consultation, we’ll determine whether we can take on your case and what the consultation will cost—without legal jargon and without any time pressure.

What Our Clients Say

5,0

Verified Google Reviews

Gepostet auf Google Google
Frank profile picture
Frank
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex überprüft, ob die Originalquelle der Bewertung Google ist.
Ich habe die Kanzlei Rehkatsch beauftragt, nachdem ich wegen einer ehrlichen Google-Rezension über die Behandlung meiner mittlerweile verstorbenen Katze massiv unter Druck gesetzt wurde. Die Gegenseite hatte sogar einen Antrag auf Unterlassung (einstweilige Verfügung) beim Landgericht Köln eingereicht, um meine Bewertung löschen zu lassen. Die Kanzlei hat mich fachlich brillant und menschlich empathisch vertreten. Das Ergebnis spricht für sich: Die Gegenseite musste ihren Antrag vor dem Landgericht Köln zurückziehen und übernimmt nun sämtliche Kosten. Gerechtigkeit siegt am Ende eben doch, wenn man bei der Wahrheit bleibt und die richtigen Experten an seiner Seite hat. Da meine Rezension den Tatsachen entspricht, wurde sie als rechtmäßig bestätigt und bleibt online. Ich kann diese Kanzlei uneingeschränkt jedem empfehlen, der sich gegen unberechtigte Abmahnungen zur Wehr setzen will. Herzlichen Dank für die großartige Arbeit!
Gepostet auf Google Google
Reiner Dinges profile picture
Reiner Dinges
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex überprüft, ob die Originalquelle der Bewertung Google ist.
Mein Eindruck: 5 Sterne werden der Betreuung und Information voll gerecht. Mit kompetenter und professionellen Handhabung meiner Markenschutz Anliegen wurde ich bestens begleitet. Immer erreichbar und individuell angepasst an die Sachlage, bin ich sicher, eine perfekte Kanzlei für mein Anliegen gefunden zu haben.
Gepostet auf Google Google
Sport-Studio Aggertal - Fitness in Lohmar profile picture
Sport-Studio Aggertal - Fitness in Lohmar
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex überprüft, ob die Originalquelle der Bewertung Google ist.
Danke für die schnelle Unterstützung! Super freundliches Team!
Gepostet auf Google Google
Jörg Krusekamp profile picture
Jörg Krusekamp
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex überprüft, ob die Originalquelle der Bewertung Google ist.
Top Beratung, Sehr kompetent
Gepostet auf Google Google
Malte M. profile picture
Malte M.
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex überprüft, ob die Originalquelle der Bewertung Google ist.
Wirklich eine sehr kompetente, freundliche und ausdrücklich einfühlsame Unterstützung, die mir hier zuteil wurde. Zudem eine zügige und unkomplizierte Kommunikation. Ein herzliches Dankeschön an alle Beteiligten!
Gepostet auf Google Google
Christiane Altenbeck profile picture
Christiane Altenbeck
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex überprüft, ob die Originalquelle der Bewertung Google ist.
Mir wurde sehr sehr gut weiter geholfen. Daumen hoch!
Gepostet auf Google Google
Patrick Baumfalk profile picture
Patrick Baumfalk
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex überprüft, ob die Originalquelle der Bewertung Google ist.
Ich bin selbst Rechtsanwalt und habe Herrn Rehkatsch bereits mehrfach Mandanten vermittelt. Die Rückmeldungen waren durchweg positiv: kompetent, engagiert und lösungsorientiert. Auch im kollegialen Austausch stets verlässlich, professionell und fair. So wünscht man sich die Zusammenarbeit unter Kollegen – klare Empfehlung!
Gepostet auf Google Google
Dennis Bastovani profile picture
Dennis Bastovani
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex überprüft, ob die Originalquelle der Bewertung Google ist.
Ich hatte eine ausgezeichnete Erfahrung mit dieser Kanzlei. Das Team ist äußerst organisiert, freundlich und verfügt über tiefgehendes Fachwissen im Bereich Musikrecht. Sie nehmen sich die Zeit, das Anliegen und die individuellen Bedürfnisse ihrer Mandanten genau zu verstehen und bieten kompetente, maßgeschneiderte Beratung. Die Kommunikation war stets klar und professionell. Wer eine zuverlässige und engagierte Anwaltskanzlei im Musikrecht sucht, ist hier in den besten Händen. Absolut empfehlenswert!
Gepostet auf Google Google
Faraz profile picture
Faraz
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex überprüft, ob die Originalquelle der Bewertung Google ist.
Sehr kompetent, hilfsbereit und auch immer erreichbar. Vor allem sehr freundlich!
Gepostet auf Google Google
MAK Management profile picture
MAK Management
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex überprüft, ob die Originalquelle der Bewertung Google ist.
Super Anwalt!
Instant Contact: Music Law

20+ YEARS OF EXPERIENCE • OVER 5,000 CASES • ATTORNEYS SPECIALIZING IN COPYRIGHT AND MEDIA LAW

More information for you on the topic of music law:

Request an initial consultation

Schedule your no-obligation initial consultation now—it’s quick and easy.

Jetzt anrufen